Almost every day, there’s a new study that comes out with sensational headlines that “proves” a certain way of training is better for fat loss than another. For example, a Duke study was published a couple of weeks ago that researched whether cardio vs weight training is better for weight loss.

The authors came to the conclusion that, “…It appears that AT (aerobic training) is the optimal mode of exercise for reducing fat mass and body mass, while a program including RT (resistance training) is needed for increasing lean mass in middle-aged, overweight/obese individuals.”1

The media took this story and ran with it. Hundreds of headlines popped up like:

  • Cardio burns more fat than weight lifting (Star Tribune)
  • Aerobic Exercise Trumps Resistance Training for Weight and Fat Loss (Science Daily)
  • Aerobic Exercise Bests Resistance Training at Burning Belly Fat (Duke Health)
  • Cardio burns more fat than weight lifting (CNN)
  • Aerobic exercise better for weight loss than resistance training (Chicago Tribune)
  • …to name just a few.

    With a reputable university behind the study and the media fervently promoting it, you are led to believe that if you want to lose fat optimally, you should only do cardio training.

    This article explores several reasons why this conclusion may not be as sound as the authors claim it to be…to put it lightly.

    Cardio vs Weight Training: Duke Study Weaknesses


    1) Is Cardio Really “Optimal” For Fat Loss? – If someone said they are going to the gym 3 days per week for 8 months in order to lose weight and fat, but only lost 3.6 pounds of fat, would you say that was a good workout routine? Well, the people in this research study did just that. When the researchers claimed that the “optimal mode of exercise for reducing fat mass” they claimed that the aerobic training group who lost only 3.6 pounds of fat in 8 months was the best way to do this. As anyone who has taken on a fat loss program knows, an average of less than half a pound of fat lost per month equals really poor results.

    2) Questionable Diet Protocol – In this particular study, these “weight loss” participants were told to adhere to a 2100 calorie diet, yet were overweight or obese to begin with. A diet of 2100 calories for someone who’s overweight or obese, would be a low calorie diet that, in and of itself, would cause weight loss. In this study, the researchers used a 3-day food diary and a 24-hour recall, two methods that have been shown to be poor predictors of actual calorie consumption, especially when dealing with an 8-month weight loss program.

    3) Cardio Group Did Not Burn The Most Fat – The researchers claimed that the aerobic training group was the group that lost the most fat, but in actuality it was the combination group who lost 5.4 pounds of fat (they also gained some muscle). This is still not a huge amount of fat loss over 8 months, but is better than the aerobic only training group.

    4) Weight Training Exercise Selection Not Very Effective – Researchers only stated that the resistance training group used 8 machines that worked the entire body. In college, I worked at a commercial gym, where they put a “circuit line” of 8 strength machines, 4 of which included single-joint movements. For example, this line included a preacher curl machine, which only works the biceps and a tricep extension machine that only worked your triceps. The other 2 isolation exercises were a leg extension and seated hamstring curl machine. These machines have their utility, but for the most part, should be used sparingly and really only for those with body building pursuits. If on the other hand, you’re trying to lose weight, you want to do as many multi-joint, free-weight movements as possible. The multi-joint exercises will induce more intensity and cause you to work more muscles, therefore increasing muscle burn.

    5) Weight Training Routine Not Very Effective – In addition to that, these circuits took anywhere from 10-12 minutes to complete the 8 machines. Three rounds of these 8 machines would take a total of 30-35 minutes. In this study, three rounds of 8 machine-based exercises took an hour, about 15-20 minutes longer than it took the aerobic group in the study. It was also 25-30 minutes longer than it took people to complete the circuit I was supervising nearly 10 years ago.

    This leads to 5 major weaknesses with this study. Overall, the aerobic group lost less than a half of pound of fat per month (not week). Food intake was not really controlled, which plays a very important factor when trying to lose fat. The intensity of the resistance training group was probably a lot less than it should be when doing a comparison of the cardio vs. weight training workouts. Lastly, the cardio training group didn’t see the best results; the training group that included both strength and cardio did.

    Cardio vs Weight Training: Duke Study Strength

    Overall, the study still had strengths that would be used in an applicable real-world setting. It focused on non-active middle-aged overweight adults with basic workouts. Overall, this study was very indicative of what the “average gym-goer” does all too often. For example, many people who are not active simply hop on a treadmill for about 30-40 minutes while doing some machines afterwards. This is something I’ve seen all too often and these are the menial results they can expect to get for their efforts (less than 4 pounds in 8 months).

    Cardio vs. Weight Training: Why Not Both?

    Those in the aerobic group were able to maintain most of their muscle mass and lost fat, but what the study didn’t highlight are other benefits of resistance training or the combination of both, better known as concurrent training.

    Other studies, with a more intense exercise protocol, have shown that weight training before cardio training enhances fat burning during the session2, and that overall resting energy expenditure is increased following weight training.3 These studies indicate that fat-burning is indeed elevated when it comes to resistance training, especially when the workouts are intense enough.

    Also, recent research is indicating that concurrent training (both aerobic and resistance training), might be the best mode of exercise for fat loss.4 The largest issue with concurrent training is that it has the potential to lead to over-training, but this can be avoided by cycling more intense workouts with cycles of easier workouts.

    Cardio vs Weight Training Conclusion

    Overall, this was a study of what the average gym-goer would expect to see if they went in without any real direction or a smart program to help them in their fat loss efforts. Whether those workouts included doing only machines, hopping on a treadmill or a combination of both, the results you will expect to see would not be very significant.

    On the other hand, if you’re willing to work out with more intensity, use more multi-joint movements, follow and be consistent with a smarter eating plan, you can expect to see much better results. This is especially true if you use a combination of both smart resistance training with some form of interval training.

    Show 4 References

    1. Willis LH, Slentz CA, Bateman LA, et al. Effects of aerobic and/or resistance training on body mass and fat mass in overweight or obese adults. J Appl Physiol. 2012;113(12):1831-7.
    2. Kang J, Rashti SL, Tranchina CP, Ratamess NA, Faigenbaum AD, Hoffman JR. Effect of preceding resistance exercise on metabolism during subsequent cardio training session. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;107(1):43-50.
    3. Ormsbee et al. Regulation of fat metabolism during resistance exercise in sedentary lean and obese men. J Appl Physiol. 2009 May;106(5):1529-37. Hat-Tip: Alwyn Cosgrove
    4. Davis WJ, Wood DT, Andrews RG, Elkind LM, Davis WB. Concurrent training enhances athletes’ strength, muscle endurance, and other measures. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(5):1487-502.


    1. profile avatar
      Jeff Jan 08, 2013 - 09:42 #

      I still agree that strength training is the real key for optimal fat loss. I had tried both but somehow had more muscle loss for doing just cardio and immediately switched to strength training and gain better results because my real goal is just to loosen the belly fat and machine exercises is not as good sometimes compared to complex DB or freeweight compund exercises.

      1. profile avatar
        John Leyva Jan 14, 2013 - 01:14 #

        @Jeff – I agree that DB and/or free weight compound exercises are the way to go.

    2. profile avatar
      Rajesh Jan 08, 2013 - 11:12 #

      I am 39, 5 ft. 7 inches and weigh 66.5 Kilos. I train 5-6 days a week, only 45 – 55 minutes max. And mostly is a mix of running – max of 15 – 20 minutes and 30 – 35 minutes of weights. I think my work out is very intense. I am from India and I love food. Our food has too much oil and fats and its not easy for me to control it. So whenever I feel I am gaining a bit of fat, I do a particular sort of interval training.
      4 minutes of running (around 12Km/hr speed), followed by 10 seconds rest and then an inverted push ups – 7 – 10 repeats – 30 sec rest and run again. I do this 4 times. And try to complete it within 20 minutes. Since I run on tread mill, owing to the switch on/off lag of the t.mill, even if I can complete it in 21 minutes, I consider it a success.
      At the end of this 4×4, I feel soo good on the mind, and so dead tired, but ultimately feeling fine physically too. Doing this once or twice in a week, I can immediately bring down my fat.
      I would much appreciate, what you think about this exercise routine. Thanks

      1. profile avatar
        John Leyva Jan 14, 2013 - 01:17 #

        @Rajesh – It looks pretty intense and if it works for you, to bring down your fat, then I would stick with it. I would suggest that over time, you continue to progress with your strength training routine (either heavier weights, more reps or less rest in between) and try to control your eating habits a bit more, but for now it looks good.

        1. profile avatar
          Rajesh Jan 14, 2013 - 05:53 #

          Thanks for replying

    3. profile avatar
      Marty vdb Jan 08, 2013 - 12:20 #

      Good write up!
      I do both.
      I do cardio to improve my cardiovascular health, to burn some instant calories, and to warm up / cool down from my resistance training.
      I do resistance training to build my strength stamina, overall physical health and to give me a long term calorie burn.
      I think both are important. Like food and drink and dislike it when one gets overhyped.

    4. profile avatar
      Birinder Jan 08, 2013 - 12:32 #

      excellent review. I do both 3 days weight training, 2 days high interval cardio ( 30 sec on 30 sec off at high speed treadmill ) I lost fat like a fast race car. Weight training is very important, so compound movements, it keeps you looking fit, and helps you lose fat

    5. profile avatar
      GW Jan 11, 2013 - 14:06 #

      Right on. I perform multijoint exercises frequently and my heart rate easily gets into the fat-burning zone. Starting to swim this month. Anxious to see how it will compliment my weight training.

    6. profile avatar
      nasho Jan 11, 2013 - 14:55 #

      good article…nice job

      i just want to share my experience… i’ve tried both cardio and weight and guess what, it works. :)…for me,cardio+weight training both really important to guys who need to lost fat…..i’ve done this for 3 and half month and i have lost 12 kg…3 days=weight training and 3days=cardio…in a week…just try it.gud luck 🙂

    7. profile avatar
      Jozef Jan 11, 2013 - 15:15 #

      Hi John,
      I totally agree with your analysis that you have given in your article. Although cardio training will greatly improve your respiratory and cardiovascular fitness, it will not burn as much fat as the weight training especially that which involves compound movements as seen in squats. You will also experience the after burn effect in weight training thereby burning more fat while you are resting.

    8. profile avatar
      nick Jan 12, 2013 - 09:44 #

      i do both cardio and weight training it gives me a great high which last all day,i look foward to my next exercise day which i do mon,wed ,fri and sun when i do a 6 mile run followed by a short circut workout great for fat burning and i have a nice lean physic, but still have to watch the calories.Enjoyed the artical John thanks

    9. profile avatar
      seyit cengiz Jan 15, 2013 - 21:02 #

      i know you addressed in a previous article that losing weight should come first before building muscle. i am trying to lose weight by doing cardio 4 times a week. i am not lifting any weight at the moment. my question is can i still do body weight exercises like push ups and prisoner squats and such
      thank you

    10. profile avatar
      afromuscle Jan 16, 2013 - 07:42 #

      I totally agree with your conclusion. I love using multi-joint compound movements for strength and muscle building and supplement this with a brisk mile every morning to keep my cardiovascular conditioning in tip top shape.

      IMO this sort of cardio helps improve your performance in the gym.. (Imagine how taxing a high volume set of squats or any compound exercise can be on your cardiovascular system…)

      Great article btw,

      Stay lean,


    11. profile avatar
      Erik Plesset Oct 21, 2016 - 18:41 #

      John – good article. I think most serious fitness enthusiasts, either professional or just people who have made fitness a “lifestyle”, know from experience concurrent training is optimum. And, of course, can’t leave diet out.

      It would be nice to see more articles or studies that promote the concurrent training vs. one over the other. It makes sense that concurrent training would be the best scenario for weight loss AND building lean muscle mass.

      Thanks for the review – great work!


      1. profile avatar
        Kristin Oct 24, 2016 - 12:13 #

        Hi Erik,

        I agree – concurrent training is a great way to increase fat loss and improve overall fitness, and it’s an excellent approach to make fitness a lifestyle. Glad you enjoyed the article! We’ll definitely consider creating more content about this topic.

        -Kristin, BuiltLean Coach & Managing Editor

    12. profile avatar
      Aparna Dhar Nov 10, 2016 - 23:18 #

      It was an informative article. I want to loose 10kgs.. I weigh 68 kgs .. am 37 yrs old..presently i do 30-40 min of cardio work out ( walking 4-5mph , cross trainer) followed by 20-30 min of stretching and weights 5 days a week. Do I need to change the plan.. can u tell me the exact ratio of cardio: weights for effective weight loss. I have lost weight but v slowly.
      Dr. Aparna Dhar

    13. profile avatar
      Ankit Jan 18, 2017 - 22:48 #

      I am Ankit, 20,I do weight first than cardio. is this correct sequence, or I am not taking protein (egg) than I lose fat fast

      1. profile avatar
        Marc Perry, CSCS, CPT Jan 23, 2017 - 23:31 #

        Hey Ankit, what is recommended in the article is to do strength training first, then cardio like you are doing

    Comments are closed 30 days from the publication date.